British Airways and their cabin crew-winners and losers?

With feelings running high and with so much at stake are BA and the employees representatives right to bring in ACAS?

If you are looking for a strong example to use to support the work of Acas and the benefits of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) then maybe you need look no further than the present dispute between British Airways and its cabin crews.  The cabin crew are planning a 12 day period of strikes during the Christmas holiday period.

What is the dispute about?  Well it's difficult to say and that is probably part of the problem with relationships between the main players being so poor.  Apparently BA want to reduce cabin crew numbers on many of its long-haul flights out of Heathrow but arguments persist that this is just the tip of the iceberg and other cost cutting arbitrary operational changes are just around the corner.

There is also the matter of a court action in the High Court in which BA are arguing that the employees union UNITE conducted the ballot required for industrial action was not conducted appropriately, with 'leaving' members included.  It is perhaps important to remember that this is an employment situation and it is not always appropriate to go to court, if long term relations between employer and employees matter and are paramount to the overall success of the business.  So who has taken their eye off the ball?  BA or are the cabin crew verging on a such a potentially damaging course of action as to put the very existence of the company at risk?

Lets look at the big picture.

The strikes are planned from 22 December to the 2 January.  If the strike lasts for the 12 day period - it will adversely affect up to 1 million passengers who have already booked flights with BA.  Up to 650 BA flights will be affected.

It is thought that a 12 day strike will cost the company up to £300m in terms of lost revenue and it will certainly not help the company in its reported £3.7bn pension deficit.

Acas has over 30 years of experience in helping organisations of all sizes to avoid and resolve problems with relationships at work but will they be given a further chance to help with mediation in the present BA cabin crew crisis? 

Acas have confirmed that they have been involved in informal talks but are hoping for a more formal role in an attempt to resolve this long running and potentially damaging row.

In the meantime the High Court has granted an injunction to BA declaring the ballot of Unite members to have been illegal due to irregularities.  Maybe this will provide a breathing space for common sense to prevail.


Related Items

The items below list this Article as being related in some way.

Amazon's recommended Books

RSS Feeds


Recent Posts

The latest posts from the blog archives.

Caparo three part test – revisited

In Robinson the Supreme Court laid to rest the proposition that there is a Caparo test which applies to all claims in the modern law of negligence.

Statutory interpretation - penal legislation is construed strictly

The Supreme Court reminded everyone per Lord Reed and Lord Hughes that 'Penal legislation is construed strictly, particularly where the penalty involves deprivation of liberty'.

Court of appeal gives judgment acknowledging unmarried woman's rights

The claim related to bereavement payments under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 as amended.

European union law – in the case of conflict between national law and european law

Walker (Appellant) v Innospec Limited and others (Respondents) [2017] UKSC 47 On appeal from [2015] EWCA Civ 1000

Vicarious liability is alive and well

This decision extends the doctrine of vicarious liability in respect of foster carers for the fist time and it represents another example of the potential for the expansion of this form of liability.

Supreme court busy - make sure you are geared up for your course

The Supreme Court has been especially busy lately.

Gina miller v secretary of state for exiting the eu 2016 as an example of the importance of judicial independence

Law students are now required to take note of how the independence and work of the judiciary has been reformed

Policing and crime bill and provisions for bail after arrest but before charge

The clear intention is that decisions on pre-charge bail should come under scrutiny.