Vanessa George and the use of indeterminate sentences

Many of you will recall the awful case of Baby Peter and this may help you when discussing the rights and wrongs of indeterminate sentences. Indeterminate sentences are not without controversy and have no fixed end dates.

Baby Peter's mother was given an indefinite sentence with a minimum term of five years after pleading guilty to causing or allowing her son's death.  Her boyfriend was jailed for life with a minimum of 10 years for raping a two-year-old girl.

The boyfriend was also given a 12-year term to run concurrently for his "major role" in Peter's death.

The couple's lodger, Jason Owen, received an indefinite sentence with a minimum term of three years for failing to take steps to save the little boy.  It was this aspect of the sentencing that caused something of a public outcry, many people being of the view that the minimum sentences to be served were too low.

The case of nursery worker Vanessa George and her fellow paedophiles, Colin Blanchard and Angela Allen, may prove to be an excellent example of the use of indeterminate sentences and some of the problems, good and bad, that can be associated with their use.  Vanessa George is to serve a minimum of 7 years before she may be considered for release by the Parole board.  Some parents think the sentence handed out was fair but many think it was not long enough.  There is also the argument that such a horrible act against very young defenceless children should be matched by a much harsher sentence on the principle that the punishment should fit the crime.

Angela Allen was also given an indeterminate sentence and ordered to serve a minimum of five years.

From the individual's point of view, as we can see from other articles, some independent organisations have identified a number of issues that can arise including problems associated with the prisoner not knowing what lies ahead of them.  When will the prisoner be able to say they have done their time and that they have paid the price of their crime?

In the case of Vanessa George, she has been told she will be held in prison until she is no longer considered a danger to the public.  This could be the rest of her life.

Related Items

The items below list this Article as being related in some way.


There are no related tags.

Amazon's recommended Books

RSS Feeds


Recent Posts

The latest posts from the blog archives.

Caparo three part test – revisited

In Robinson the Supreme Court laid to rest the proposition that there is a Caparo test which applies to all claims in the modern law of negligence.

Statutory interpretation - penal legislation is construed strictly

The Supreme Court reminded everyone per Lord Reed and Lord Hughes that 'Penal legislation is construed strictly, particularly where the penalty involves deprivation of liberty'.

Court of appeal gives judgment acknowledging unmarried woman's rights

The claim related to bereavement payments under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 as amended.

European union law – in the case of conflict between national law and european law

Walker (Appellant) v Innospec Limited and others (Respondents) [2017] UKSC 47 On appeal from [2015] EWCA Civ 1000

Vicarious liability is alive and well

This decision extends the doctrine of vicarious liability in respect of foster carers for the fist time and it represents another example of the potential for the expansion of this form of liability.

Supreme court busy - make sure you are geared up for your course

The Supreme Court has been especially busy lately.

Gina miller v secretary of state for exiting the eu 2016 as an example of the importance of judicial independence

Law students are now required to take note of how the independence and work of the judiciary has been reformed

Policing and crime bill and provisions for bail after arrest but before charge

The clear intention is that decisions on pre-charge bail should come under scrutiny.