Common assault or self defence: the case of Sgt Delroy Smellie

Will the case of Sgt Delroy Smellie help with our understanding of how the courts approach the use of force by police officers?

You may remember that it was Sgt Delroy Smellie who allegedly struck a woman with his police baton during the G20 protests in London in April 2009. Sgt Delroy Smellie who is a member of the Metropolitan Police has been charged with common assault on Nicola Fisher. The incident was caught on video at the time and posted on YouTube. The case is being heard by City of Westminster Magistrates. Sgt Smellie denies the charge.


The case illustrates that in the event of an allegation of criminal behaviour, such as assault by individual police officers possibly exceeding their powers, proceedings can be brought against the individual officers. Officer Smellie has told the court that he felt threatened and he has added that he was fearful that Ms Fisher may have been holding weapons in her hand. The court has learnt that Ms Fisher had been holding a carton of orange juice.


The difference in size between them has already been highlighted and Sgt Smellie acknowledged that he was aware that Ms Fisher was ‘ significantly smaller’ when he had been asked how hard he had hit Ms Fisher. The officer then went on to tell the court ‘However it had to be hard enough to achieve the object of negating the threat’. The officer could not remember hitting Ms Fisher a second time with his baton across the leg. Initially, Sgt Smellie had struck the woman across the face which in his words was a ‘clearance strike’.


Was the force used justified?  Will the court accept that an experienced police officer can feel threatened and isolated in such situations?  What was the mood of the protesters before the confrontation?  Was it fair to say the mood of the crowd changed and that they closed in causing the officer to feel isolated?  We must wait and see as the case continues but there is no doubt that the outcome will be of interest to individual police officers and Senior Officers alike as well as members of the public.


Related Items

The items below list this Article as being related in some way.


There are no related tags.

Amazon's recommended Books

RSS Feeds


Recent Posts

The latest posts from the blog archives.

Caparo three part test – revisited

In Robinson the Supreme Court laid to rest the proposition that there is a Caparo test which applies to all claims in the modern law of negligence.

Statutory interpretation - penal legislation is construed strictly

The Supreme Court reminded everyone per Lord Reed and Lord Hughes that 'Penal legislation is construed strictly, particularly where the penalty involves deprivation of liberty'.

Court of appeal gives judgment acknowledging unmarried woman's rights

The claim related to bereavement payments under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 as amended.

European union law – in the case of conflict between national law and european law

Walker (Appellant) v Innospec Limited and others (Respondents) [2017] UKSC 47 On appeal from [2015] EWCA Civ 1000

Vicarious liability is alive and well

This decision extends the doctrine of vicarious liability in respect of foster carers for the fist time and it represents another example of the potential for the expansion of this form of liability.

Supreme court busy - make sure you are geared up for your course

The Supreme Court has been especially busy lately.

Gina miller v secretary of state for exiting the eu 2016 as an example of the importance of judicial independence

Law students are now required to take note of how the independence and work of the judiciary has been reformed

Policing and crime bill and provisions for bail after arrest but before charge

The clear intention is that decisions on pre-charge bail should come under scrutiny.