For Yorkshire Ripper Peter Sutcliffe life will mean life!

There are some prisoners who receive the 'whole life' tariff and Peter Sutcliffe is one of them.

Peter Sutcliffe, who became known as the Yorkshire Ripper, was given a life sentence for each of the 13 women he murdered and for each of the 7 he attempted to murder.  Sutcliffe received these sentences back in 1981. 

In 2009 the High Court ordered that he must serve a 'whole life' tariff and last year he applied for leave to challenge the decision.

The Court of Appeal have rejected his application unanimously.

Lord Chief Justice, lord Judge, reached the decision that a 'whole life' tariff, meaning the prisoner will never be released, was the only appropriate sentence.

The guidelines, which set out how long murderers should spend in prison before being considered for parole, came about as a result of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.  The guidelines are there for judges to follow and if they do not they must give reasons for their departure from them.  The guidelines provide direction in the case of multiple murders and enables the trial judge to determine that the accused should serve a 'whole life' tariff where there have been aggravating factors.  The factors are where there is evidence of sexual abuse, pre-planning, abduction or terrorism.


Related Items

The items below list this Article as being related in some way.


There are no related tags.

Amazon's recommended Books

RSS Feeds


Recent Posts

The latest posts from the blog archives.

Caparo three part test – revisited

In Robinson the Supreme Court laid to rest the proposition that there is a Caparo test which applies to all claims in the modern law of negligence.

Statutory interpretation - penal legislation is construed strictly

The Supreme Court reminded everyone per Lord Reed and Lord Hughes that 'Penal legislation is construed strictly, particularly where the penalty involves deprivation of liberty'.

Court of appeal gives judgment acknowledging unmarried woman's rights

The claim related to bereavement payments under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 as amended.

European union law – in the case of conflict between national law and european law

Walker (Appellant) v Innospec Limited and others (Respondents) [2017] UKSC 47 On appeal from [2015] EWCA Civ 1000

Vicarious liability is alive and well

This decision extends the doctrine of vicarious liability in respect of foster carers for the fist time and it represents another example of the potential for the expansion of this form of liability.

Supreme court busy - make sure you are geared up for your course

The Supreme Court has been especially busy lately.

Gina miller v secretary of state for exiting the eu 2016 as an example of the importance of judicial independence

Law students are now required to take note of how the independence and work of the judiciary has been reformed

Policing and crime bill and provisions for bail after arrest but before charge

The clear intention is that decisions on pre-charge bail should come under scrutiny.