The age of criminal responsibility gets thrown into the political arena

Liberal Democrats have debated whether the age of criminal responsibility in this country should be raised from 10 years to 14 years. Does the vote in favour reflect the public's feelings on the matter?

The age of criminal responsibility, in this country, presently stands at 10 years and there are some who would like us to be more in line with other European countries on this particular matter.  The last serious political debate on the question of criminal responsibility of young persons took place when Parliament debated and approved what became the Crime and Disorder Act 1998.

Interestingly, for any of you looking for an example of a legal, and some would say a social, issue best left to Parliament as opposed to the courts then look no further than this particular question. The former House of Lords back in the nineties preferred to leave the matter of reform to Parliament.

The judiciary can only go so far - it is their job to resolve disputes and make decisions on particular cases before them. Judges are not elected and face criticisms that they would be acting undemocratically if they strayed too far into the realms of law making.This is charged to Parliament on our behalf.

This is a time when we should be cherishing the fact that we have a multi party system as part of our democracy and admiring the efforts of those striving for democracy. It is noteworthy that one of the by products of such a system is openness and debate which leads to an informed opinion.

At present the proposal to raise the age of criminal responsibility of children is before the Liberal Democratic party at their party conference in Sheffield which is attended only by members of the Liberal Democratic party. If the proposal is to gain momentum it will be tested and debated in the public arena by other political parties, professionals and other interested parties as well as members of the public generally before it becomes government policy for reform.

Related Items

The items below list this Article as being related in some way.

Amazon's recommended Books

RSS Feeds

Archives

Recent Posts

The latest posts from the lawmentor.co.uk blog archives.

Gina miller v secretary of state for exiting the eu 2016 as an example of the importance of judicial independence

Law students are now required to take note of how the independence and work of the judiciary has been reformed

Policing and crime bill and provisions for bail after arrest but before charge

The clear intention is that decisions on pre-charge bail should come under scrutiny.

The judicial committee of the privy council – a colonial legacy

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council is the highest court of appeal for many Commonwealth countries.

Does the scrapping of glen parva secure college and the lifting of a book ban herald the start to serious reform of the failing prison system?

How much of Michael Gove's vision for prisons and the criminal justice system will be effective in righting self-inflicted wrongs remains to be seen.

Police-led prosecutions are to be extended again.

Home Secretary Theresa May announces “We will extend the use of police-led prosecutions to cut the time you spend waiting for the Crown Prosecution Service”.

Perverse verdict in the name of justice? mutiny at high down

High Down prison in Banstead may not be on the high seas but apparently it can be the scene of a mutiny.

Statutory interpretation - bogdanic -v- the secretary of state for the home department; qbd 29-aug-2014

The case concerns the operation of the carriers' liability regime in relation to the immigration control zones in France.

The right to cancel revisited – a matter of interpretation (robertson v swift 2014)

The aim of the Regulations is to protect consumers from the risks they face when entering into a contract outside of business premises.