Two countries separated by their legal systems as well as their language? Dr Conrad Murray

With the forthcoming trial of Dr Conrad Murray are we to witness another media frenzy?

Any study of the legal system in America will soon tell you that it is not just the continued use of the death penalty which makes our system so different.

In the weeks leading up to the opening of the trial of Dr Conrad Murray, who is currently facing manslaughter charges over Michael Jackson's death, we have been told that the trial Judge,Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor,is to allow the trial process to be televised.  Judge Michael Pastor handed down the surprise order provided that the camera equipment is placed in a position which minimises any intrusion.

At the same time, on our side of the pond, we have been told that the Supreme Court see no reason why micro networking sites cannot be used live in court. The building used by the UKSC has been fully Wi Fi enabled, including all the courtrooms, in order to facilitate use of technology in and outside court to keep abreast of events.  The judiciary, having considered the matter, have decided that it is acceptable to Twitter in the Supreme Court in most circumstances as the Court does not rely upon a jury and there are no witnesses to distract as the proceedings are usually based on paperwork.

We do not allow the reporting of judicial proceedings and recording and imaging is prohibited under the Contempt of Court Act 1981.

Is that the end of the differences? It seems not, any of you who have searched for information regarding the case will realise that articles are accessible on the internet. Some even report likely defence arguments which may or may not be raised.  Any potential juror is able to pick up and read such material and this is where we seem to be much more protective of the principle that jurors should only base their decisions and deliberations upon evidence that they have seen or heard as part of the trial.  There are well known reporting restrictions in this country but not so in America. This raises the issue of whether such reporting simply encourages trials by the media.  Who can forget the case of O.J. Simpson?

Having allowed reporting to continue in America it is strange that it seems to be generally accepted that this media coverage may, in some people's eyes, affect the outcome of the trial. To counteract this the Judge is expected to produce a 30 page questionnaire containing 160 questions for jurors to answer. Jurors will have to answer these as part of their vetting arrangements to try and make sure that the jurors can be sufficiently open minded so as not to be prejudiced before the trial begins. This process may take some time but it seems the Judge is anticipating that this will need to be done before the trial commences properly in May.  In this country we do not spend nearly so much time concerning ourselves over such matters although both parties do have the opportunity to raise questions of the jurors.


Related Items

The items below list this Article as being related in some way.

Amazon's recommended Books

RSS Feeds


Recent Posts

The latest posts from the blog archives.

Caparo three part test – revisited

In Robinson the Supreme Court laid to rest the proposition that there is a Caparo test which applies to all claims in the modern law of negligence.

Statutory interpretation - penal legislation is construed strictly

The Supreme Court reminded everyone per Lord Reed and Lord Hughes that 'Penal legislation is construed strictly, particularly where the penalty involves deprivation of liberty'.

Court of appeal gives judgment acknowledging unmarried woman's rights

The claim related to bereavement payments under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 as amended.

European union law – in the case of conflict between national law and european law

Walker (Appellant) v Innospec Limited and others (Respondents) [2017] UKSC 47 On appeal from [2015] EWCA Civ 1000

Vicarious liability is alive and well

This decision extends the doctrine of vicarious liability in respect of foster carers for the fist time and it represents another example of the potential for the expansion of this form of liability.

Supreme court busy - make sure you are geared up for your course

The Supreme Court has been especially busy lately.

Gina miller v secretary of state for exiting the eu 2016 as an example of the importance of judicial independence

Law students are now required to take note of how the independence and work of the judiciary has been reformed

Policing and crime bill and provisions for bail after arrest but before charge

The clear intention is that decisions on pre-charge bail should come under scrutiny.