More Red Tape – new Continuous Insurance Enforcement

Is this a case of bureaucracy keeping check on bureaucracy?

Those of you who are looking for examples of ‘red tape’ might be interested to learn that this new requirement which attempts to clamp down on uninsured vehicles came into effect on the 20 June. Road Safety Minister Mike Penning reminds us why the new law is necessary saying:

'An estimated 1.4 million drivers are flouting the law by driving without insurance. This is a serious offence and results in accidents that cause about 160 deaths each year - and more than 23,000 people are injured by uninsured drivers. It also adds around £30 per year to honest drivers' motor insurance policies.

'We know who the registered keepers are with vehicles that have no insurance and letters will be dropping onto their doormats from this week. It's no longer a case of if you will get caught but when you will get caught.'  

Previously the matter of driving whilst uninsured was an offence as it still is but only usually came to light if you were stopped for some other offence or spotted as a result of a vigilant police patrol car having an onboard computer with the right software. Many may argue that the new law seems to smack of big brother and that it is targeted at ‘hard done by’ drivers. Could they be right?

  However it is possible to argue that the measure will free up the police from dealing with regulatory matters so that they have more time to ‘catch real criminals’.  

On the other hand we are led to believe that red tape may be a thing of the past if we look at the government’s new  Red Tape Challenge website which invites comments and observation on a whole host of rules and regulations according to various themes.

  Pity if you have any views about vehicle insurance – because that topic has already been dealt with!

 Is this a case of bureaucracy keeping check on bureaucracy?


Related Items

The items below list this Article as being related in some way.

Amazon's recommended Books

RSS Feeds


Recent Posts

The latest posts from the blog archives.

Caparo three part test – revisited

In Robinson the Supreme Court laid to rest the proposition that there is a Caparo test which applies to all claims in the modern law of negligence.

Statutory interpretation - penal legislation is construed strictly

The Supreme Court reminded everyone per Lord Reed and Lord Hughes that 'Penal legislation is construed strictly, particularly where the penalty involves deprivation of liberty'.

Court of appeal gives judgment acknowledging unmarried woman's rights

The claim related to bereavement payments under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 as amended.

European union law – in the case of conflict between national law and european law

Walker (Appellant) v Innospec Limited and others (Respondents) [2017] UKSC 47 On appeal from [2015] EWCA Civ 1000

Vicarious liability is alive and well

This decision extends the doctrine of vicarious liability in respect of foster carers for the fist time and it represents another example of the potential for the expansion of this form of liability.

Supreme court busy - make sure you are geared up for your course

The Supreme Court has been especially busy lately.

Gina miller v secretary of state for exiting the eu 2016 as an example of the importance of judicial independence

Law students are now required to take note of how the independence and work of the judiciary has been reformed

Policing and crime bill and provisions for bail after arrest but before charge

The clear intention is that decisions on pre-charge bail should come under scrutiny.