Legal protection for whistleblowers.

Call for greater legal protection for whistleblowers.

We have heard many fine words deploring the alleged misconduct on the part of  a minority of carers  recently following the BBC’s Panorama ‘fly on wall’ documentary.  We may be excused for thinking that something is being done especially as some of those speakers mention systems in place to protect whistleblowers.  So should we be concerned or not?

Well, thanks to an article by Nina Lakhani in the Independent, we are able to appreciate that there are to be calls by leading health professionals for greater and more effective protection for whistleblowers in this country amidst concerns that there is a ‘code of silence’ operating in the NHS.

This is despite the passing of the Public Interest Act 1998.  It would be interesting to learn whether there have been any protected disclosures under the Act and the outcomes of these disclosures.  We are not talking about trivial matters here.  The 1998 Act defines disclosures qualifying for protection as:

Disclosures qualifying for protection:

1  In this Part a "qualifying disclosure" means any disclosure of information which, in the reasonable belief of the worker making the disclosure, tends to show one or more of the following -

  • that a criminal offence has been committed, is being committed or is likely to be committed,
  • that a person has failed, is failing or is likely to fail to comply with any legal obligation to which he is subject,
  • that a miscarriage of justice has occurred, is occurring or is likely to occur,
  • that the health or safety of any individual has been, is being or is likely to be endangered,
  • that the environment has been, is being or is likely to be damaged, or
  • that information tending to show any matter falling within any one of the preceding paragraphs has been, is being or is likely to be deliberately concealed.


Related Items

The items below list this Article as being related in some way.

Amazon's recommended Books

RSS Feeds


Recent Posts

The latest posts from the blog archives.

Caparo three part test – revisited

In Robinson the Supreme Court laid to rest the proposition that there is a Caparo test which applies to all claims in the modern law of negligence.

Statutory interpretation - penal legislation is construed strictly

The Supreme Court reminded everyone per Lord Reed and Lord Hughes that 'Penal legislation is construed strictly, particularly where the penalty involves deprivation of liberty'.

Court of appeal gives judgment acknowledging unmarried woman's rights

The claim related to bereavement payments under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 as amended.

European union law – in the case of conflict between national law and european law

Walker (Appellant) v Innospec Limited and others (Respondents) [2017] UKSC 47 On appeal from [2015] EWCA Civ 1000

Vicarious liability is alive and well

This decision extends the doctrine of vicarious liability in respect of foster carers for the fist time and it represents another example of the potential for the expansion of this form of liability.

Supreme court busy - make sure you are geared up for your course

The Supreme Court has been especially busy lately.

Gina miller v secretary of state for exiting the eu 2016 as an example of the importance of judicial independence

Law students are now required to take note of how the independence and work of the judiciary has been reformed

Policing and crime bill and provisions for bail after arrest but before charge

The clear intention is that decisions on pre-charge bail should come under scrutiny.