The use of the civil courts can be very public

Students who are familiar with the highs and lows of the music industry may relate to this potentially high profile case.

We often try to explain to students that one of the disadvantages of litigating in the courts is, as every lawyer will tell you, the uncertainty of the outcome – no matter how confident you are you can never guarantee the outcome. In addition it's a little bit like 'washing your dirty linen in public'. Civil litigation is about winning and not losing, so there can be little incentive to compromise and it seems only natural to try and rubbish the other side as much as possible in order to advance your own case. It can damage working relationships irreparably and sometimes this means that businesses often find it difficult to work together in the future and for this reason alternative ways of resolving a dispute are often explored (Alternative Dispute Resolution or ADR).

One of the advantages of the use of ADR is that the method agreed upon can be conducted in private as opposed to the very public arena of the adversarial system adopted in the courts.

A case which seems to be embarking upon the very public route of litigation is the reported legal action between former Oasis member Liam Gallagher and his brother Noel over allegations concerning Liam's ability to perform at a music festival due to a medical condition. How such a legal action will fair in the 'beady eye' of the media, remains to be seen but the case may well serve as a useful and timely reminder of some of the pitfalls that surround litigation. Many will remember the stormy and public tiffs between the brothers during their careers.

Related Items

The items below list this Article as being related in some way.

Amazon's recommended Books

RSS Feeds


Recent Posts

The latest posts from the blog archives.

Caparo three part test – revisited

In Robinson the Supreme Court laid to rest the proposition that there is a Caparo test which applies to all claims in the modern law of negligence.

Statutory interpretation - penal legislation is construed strictly

The Supreme Court reminded everyone per Lord Reed and Lord Hughes that 'Penal legislation is construed strictly, particularly where the penalty involves deprivation of liberty'.

Court of appeal gives judgment acknowledging unmarried woman's rights

The claim related to bereavement payments under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 as amended.

European union law – in the case of conflict between national law and european law

Walker (Appellant) v Innospec Limited and others (Respondents) [2017] UKSC 47 On appeal from [2015] EWCA Civ 1000

Vicarious liability is alive and well

This decision extends the doctrine of vicarious liability in respect of foster carers for the fist time and it represents another example of the potential for the expansion of this form of liability.

Supreme court busy - make sure you are geared up for your course

The Supreme Court has been especially busy lately.

Gina miller v secretary of state for exiting the eu 2016 as an example of the importance of judicial independence

Law students are now required to take note of how the independence and work of the judiciary has been reformed

Policing and crime bill and provisions for bail after arrest but before charge

The clear intention is that decisions on pre-charge bail should come under scrutiny.