Those August riots again – sentencing

Is the judiciary really independent and in touch with public opinion or are they constrained by sentencing guidelines which do not enable them to reflect the individual circumstances of the offence and all the surrounding facts?

For an informed and interesting discussion about the sentencing of rioters and looters in the context of the criminal justice system and sentencing guidelines, you may find the article “I predict a riot – about sentencing” by Felicity Gerry, Halsbury's Law Exchange 12 August 2011, of interest. Apart from the obvious references to demands for tougher sentences, the article also raises the problem of how to differentiate between rioters who are participating and those who may have organised crimes of violence and public disorder, as well as the matter of when it might be appropriate for some offenders to be dealt with by summary proceedings in the Magistrates Court and more serious offences to be sent by way of committal to the Crown Court for sentencing.

The practicality of sentencing guidelines is also raised along with issues of consistency and comparisons with sentences handed out for criminal offences which are not committed during public disorder.

Our attention is also drawn to the work of the Sentencing Council.


The Sentencing Council  was set up under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 in order to promote greater transparency and consistency in sentencing, but at the same time respecting the independence of the judiciary. The council is associated with the Ministry of Justice and replaced its predecessors, the Sentencing Guidelines Council and the Sentencing Advisory Panel. A major part of the organisation's work is to prepare sentencing guidelines.

Once the dust has settled it remains to be seen whether the Sentencing Council will come under any political scrutiny as politicians wish to be seen to be tough on crime.

Related Items

The items below list this Article as being related in some way.

Amazon's recommended Books

RSS Feeds


Recent Posts

The latest posts from the blog archives.

Caparo three part test – revisited

In Robinson the Supreme Court laid to rest the proposition that there is a Caparo test which applies to all claims in the modern law of negligence.

Statutory interpretation - penal legislation is construed strictly

The Supreme Court reminded everyone per Lord Reed and Lord Hughes that 'Penal legislation is construed strictly, particularly where the penalty involves deprivation of liberty'.

Court of appeal gives judgment acknowledging unmarried woman's rights

The claim related to bereavement payments under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 as amended.

European union law – in the case of conflict between national law and european law

Walker (Appellant) v Innospec Limited and others (Respondents) [2017] UKSC 47 On appeal from [2015] EWCA Civ 1000

Vicarious liability is alive and well

This decision extends the doctrine of vicarious liability in respect of foster carers for the fist time and it represents another example of the potential for the expansion of this form of liability.

Supreme court busy - make sure you are geared up for your course

The Supreme Court has been especially busy lately.

Gina miller v secretary of state for exiting the eu 2016 as an example of the importance of judicial independence

Law students are now required to take note of how the independence and work of the judiciary has been reformed

Policing and crime bill and provisions for bail after arrest but before charge

The clear intention is that decisions on pre-charge bail should come under scrutiny.