Garrow’s Law - Spitalfields Riots 1765 – 1769

Anyone watching Garrow’s Law (Sunday 20th November 2011) could be forgiven for making a connection between the events of the Spitalfields Riots circa 1769, and the events of what have now become known as the August Riots of 2011.

Anyone watching this week's episode of Garrow's Law, (Sunday 20th November 2011) could be forgiven for making a connection between the events of the Spitalfields Riots circa: 1769 as portrayed in the episode, and the events of what have now become known as the August Riots of 2011.

During Garrow's passionate and driven cross examination of a master weaver giving evidence for the crown, we were treated to an inspired plea to the jury. Garrow carried on, ignoring Judge Buller's protests and threats to hold him in contempt of court - music to the ears of any aspiring counsel!  They don't teach you that during vocational training.

We also learnt about paid informants when Garrow reminded one witness of the consequences of his earlier performance as a witness in sending two men to the gallows.  Apparently on 6th December 1769, the two men involved in that trial were hanged in Bethnal Green, in front of the Salmon and Ball, a public house which still exists today.

Somehow, in true Garrow style, a written note was produced, purporting to be the last words spoken by one of the condemned men, John Doyle.  Garrow, with expert timing and panache, read out the recorded words that John Doyle allegedly spoke to the crowd as he stood on the hangman's scaffold with the rope around his neck:

" I John Doyle do hereby declare, as my last dying words in the presence of my Almighty God, that I am as innocent of the fact I am now to die for as the child unborn. Let my blood lie to that wicked man who has purchased it with gold, and them notorious wretches who swore it falsely away."

In the episode this week, two male defendants were in dock charged with rioting and damaging looms and cutting silk. Riots were common place at the time as impoverished weavers fought against the effects of cheaper imports from France and Ireland driving down prices and denying them of their livelihoods. There was no question about considering what was to be done with them - they were to be hung if convicted.

Dramatically one defendant turned King's evidence against the other and gave evidence for the Crown. Just to add another twist to the trial the defendants were brothers in law and long time friends, and the one remaining defendant, condemned by the other, was married to his friend's sister and would be hung if found guilty by the jury.

In a fit of brilliance and either self-confidence or foolhardiness, Garrow embarked upon a last ditch, do or die attempt to sway the jury by pulling at their heart strings to persuade them to return a 'perverse' verdict (yes it is surprising what we can learn from dramatisations), by finding the defendant not guilty against all the evidence. It worked, and the foreman of the jury, despite what some might have seen as an attempt by Judge Buller to bully the jury by allowing them hardly any time to deliberate and by saying there was nothing to consider - meaning that the defendant was guilty, uttered the words 'not guilty'.

However, was the defendant 'guilty' all along? Garrow had acted true to his profession and to his abilities but had he unwittingly got 'carried away'? We shall never know. Perhaps even more confusing is the fact that Garrow was born 13 April 1760, joined Lincoln's Inn in November 1778, and was called to the Bar on 27 November 1783 some years after the Spitalfields Riots!




Related Items

The items below list this Article as being related in some way.

Amazon's recommended Books

RSS Feeds


Recent Posts

The latest posts from the blog archives.

Caparo three part test – revisited

In Robinson the Supreme Court laid to rest the proposition that there is a Caparo test which applies to all claims in the modern law of negligence.

Statutory interpretation - penal legislation is construed strictly

The Supreme Court reminded everyone per Lord Reed and Lord Hughes that 'Penal legislation is construed strictly, particularly where the penalty involves deprivation of liberty'.

Court of appeal gives judgment acknowledging unmarried woman's rights

The claim related to bereavement payments under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 as amended.

European union law – in the case of conflict between national law and european law

Walker (Appellant) v Innospec Limited and others (Respondents) [2017] UKSC 47 On appeal from [2015] EWCA Civ 1000

Vicarious liability is alive and well

This decision extends the doctrine of vicarious liability in respect of foster carers for the fist time and it represents another example of the potential for the expansion of this form of liability.

Supreme court busy - make sure you are geared up for your course

The Supreme Court has been especially busy lately.

Gina miller v secretary of state for exiting the eu 2016 as an example of the importance of judicial independence

Law students are now required to take note of how the independence and work of the judiciary has been reformed

Policing and crime bill and provisions for bail after arrest but before charge

The clear intention is that decisions on pre-charge bail should come under scrutiny.