Law and morals

Some of you may find it useful to think about these questions as they seem to be bothering politicians at the moment and that can cause problems in itself.

In no time at all we will be back at School or College studying law. Some of you may be studying the subject for the first time. Where do we start? What is law and how do we define it? What is the difference between law and morals or are they the same? Some of you may find it useful to think about these questions as they seem to be bothering politicians at the moment and that can cause problems in itself.

 

Law is often described as a set of rules. The rules are binding upon the community or society which adopts them. Adoption is not enough and a characteristic is that they are imposed in some way and carry appropriate sanctions if they are not observed. Morals are sometimes the same as the law but not always. For example, it has been widely accepted by many communities  that such things as theft and murder are wrong morally, it also happens that many communities have adopted laws prohibiting such behaviour as well.

 

There is no single definition of morals so you may find it helpful to consider different views on this point, but Elliot and Quinn take the view that morals are values and beliefs held by society or sections of them and that these morals tell those who share them what is right and what is wrong.

 

A discussion or debate of the definitions of law and morals can be extremely enlightening as can the reasons and differences between morals and the law and how such inconsistencies may be expected.

 

David Cameron has entered the affray recently by commenting upon the personal finances of the comedian Jimmy Carr in the context of the morality of alleged tax evasion schemes which result in apparently affecting the tax burden on individuals. David Cameron is on record as saying that he thinks such schemes are 'morally wrong' and added that "The Government is acting by looking at a general anti avoidance law but we do need to make progress on this.”

 

More recently David Gauke, a Treasury minister, has suggested that it is immoral to pay tradesmen cash-in-hand.  There is also the issue of tax evasion and the important distinction with tax avoidance. For example, not declaring earnings you know about and which are liable for tax amounts to tax evasion and is illegal.  Declaring those earnings but using legal means to ensure you pay the lowest tax possible on them is tax avoidance and perfectly legal.  But is it 'morally wrong'?

 

Your tutor will no doubt refer you to appropriate reading but as a start and thanks to David Thomas of the of the Telegraph you may like to consider how you would fair if you completed their Quiz: how immoral are you?

 

Related Items

The items below list this Article as being related in some way.

Amazon's recommended Books

RSS Feeds

Archives

Recent Posts

The latest posts from the lawmentor.co.uk blog archives.

Gina miller v secretary of state for exiting the eu 2016 as an example of the importance of judicial independence

Law students are now required to take note of how the independence and work of the judiciary has been reformed

Policing and crime bill and provisions for bail after arrest but before charge

The clear intention is that decisions on pre-charge bail should come under scrutiny.

The judicial committee of the privy council – a colonial legacy

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council is the highest court of appeal for many Commonwealth countries.

Does the scrapping of glen parva secure college and the lifting of a book ban herald the start to serious reform of the failing prison system?

How much of Michael Gove's vision for prisons and the criminal justice system will be effective in righting self-inflicted wrongs remains to be seen.

Police-led prosecutions are to be extended again.

Home Secretary Theresa May announces “We will extend the use of police-led prosecutions to cut the time you spend waiting for the Crown Prosecution Service”.

Perverse verdict in the name of justice? mutiny at high down

High Down prison in Banstead may not be on the high seas but apparently it can be the scene of a mutiny.

Statutory interpretation - bogdanic -v- the secretary of state for the home department; qbd 29-aug-2014

The case concerns the operation of the carriers' liability regime in relation to the immigration control zones in France.

The right to cancel revisited – a matter of interpretation (robertson v swift 2014)

The aim of the Regulations is to protect consumers from the risks they face when entering into a contract outside of business premises.