Sufficiency

Consideration must be sufficient but does not have to be adequate.

Consideration must be sufficient but does not have to be adequate Thomas v Thomas (1842).

Consideration is considered sufficient if it is real (White v Bluett (1853)),if it is tangible (Ward v Byham (1956)) and if it has some discernible value (Chappel v Nestle (1960)).

Consideration does not need not be adequate but it must be of some value.

Related Items

The items below list this as being related in some way.

Amazon's recommended Books

RSS Feeds